| Articulus 26 – SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS1. The Parties, in reaching a decision on import under this Protocol or under its domestic measures implementing the Protocol, potest considerare, conveniensque internationalis officium, socio-economic considerations arising from the impact of living modified organisms on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, especially with regard to the value of biological diversity to indigenous and local communities.2. The Parties are encouraged to cooperate on research and information exchange on any socio‑economic impacts of living modified organisms, especially on indigenous and local communities. |
Unum principalis machinationes Aja ratio est de CPB, Partes, quae non est quod est eundem tamen esset domi regulatory conspiciatur biosafety, decernere valeat certiores environment pro introductione in partis LMOs. Articulus 10 stipulates that decisions taken by the Party of import shall be in accordance with Article 15 (risk assessment).
Paragraph 1 of article 26 states: “The Parties, in reaching a decision on import under this Protocol or under its domestic measures implementing the Protocol, potest considerare, conveniensque internationalis officium, socio-economic considerations arising from the impact of living modified organisms on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, praesertim quod attinet ad varietatem indigenae communitates locales biologicum valorem. "
A et h = agendae MOP7 (Item 13)::
In 6th Sessiones PARTIUM ('MOP6'):
- instituit ad hoc technicae periti coetus (AHTEG) ut develop concepta secs claritatem in contextu paragraph 1 Articulus 26;
- rogavit exsecutiva Secretarius contexere, radices, et circa ipsum dolor secs;
- constare online disputatione coetus contendere et synthesize commutatio views, notitia et consequitur in secs.
Erit enim in conspectu eorum famam MOP7 partium concursus ad consultandum atque agitandum super AHTEG ulterius quandam obiectivum 1.7 de Carthagine ad consilium opportune protocollo. (Doc UNEP / CBD / p /, COP MOP / VII / XI).
Observationes PRRI
Socialia et oeconomica considerationes (Secs) PRRI membra sunt momenti, et cognovit quia non alius sit quam speratam socio-oeconomica beneficia recentioribus biotechnology investigatores facit publicum dedicant eorum gestas cum hodierna investigationis in biotechnology ad bonum commune,.
Memor, quia oportet nos manere, Convention in luce ponit, diversitas in articulo Vellei 16 qui obvius modern transferunt ad consequendum essentiam biotechnology CBD aliquip ex, et in articulo instruit 19 quaeque pars, ut ante, elementum et elit consequitur et beneficia, ex accessum ad biotechnologiarum, praesertim in regionibus paulatim.
Propter hoc, quod est esse arbitrium fabri eorum debite arbitrium factionis potentia oeconomica beneficia socialia, se putari et ad pulsu œconomica-tardus notitia technology quod inductio. Hoc loco, it is important to take into account: 1) what modern biotechnology can accomplish that cannot be done by conventional breeding, 2) the research that is ongoing to date, et 3) the experiences are of farmers who have grown GM crops
Some interpretations of article 26 suggest that SEC are part of risk assessment, that Article 26 implies an obligation to add additional steps in the approval procedure, or that any SEC would suffice to deny approval of import of LMOs. These are erroneous notions.
Looking at the key elements of this provision:
- »The Parties, in reaching a decision on import" > This provision addresses decision making, not risk assessment. While article 10 stipulates that decisions taken shall be in accordance with article 15 (risk assessment), the decision making step is clearly distinct from the risk assessment.
- »potest considerare" > This provision relates to a possibility, non obligatio,.
- »conveniensque internationalis officium" > Lorem relevant, ut obligationes potest in WTO tractatus / SPS tum qualis, policy declarationes Agenda 21.
- »luctus ex socio-oeconomicae rationes conservationem LMOs (etc)....." > ex ipsis verbis, "et de" patet, quod hoc etiam provisum sit, ut sic, non quantum ad secs, sed ex secs ictum LMOs conservationem (etc).
PRAETEREA, article 26 utitur mediis vox «pulsu», non, - ut in multis aliis articulis - ut adversa effectus in potentia,. Jam et usus habet hoc nomen "afficit" et signanter, sicut potentia se extendit ad utilitatem et pericula,.