In un articolo pubblicato su 15 Luglio 2015, l'autore passa in rassegna l'evidenza dei crediti in relazione agli organismi geneticamente modificati (OGM). Alcune citazioni dal articolo:
“Primo, è vero che la questione è complicata. Ma più ci si addentra, il più delle frodi si trova nel processo contro gli OGM. E 'pieno di errori, fallacie, misconceptions, misrepresentations, and lies”, Seconda, the central argument of the anti-GMO movement—that prudence and caution are reasons to avoid genetically engineered, or GE, food—is a sham. Activists who tell you to play it safe around GMOs take no such care in evaluating the alternatives.”…..”It makes no sense to avoid GMOs based on standards that nobody applies to non-GMO food”…..” Third, there are valid concerns about some aspects of GE agriculture, such as herbicides, monocultures, and patents. But none of these concerns is fundamentally about genetic engineering. Genetic engineering isn’t a thing. It’s a process that can be used in different ways to create different things.”….”GMOs didn’t invent monoculture, and banning them won’t make it go away. Farmers have been cultivating homogeneity for millennia”.
The full article can be found through this collegamento.